When
our weekly game group went to see Avengers in May, I could hardly believe my eyes. Walking from the theater, all I could think of was the magnitude of what I had just seen. As a film experience,
Avengers was simply mind-blowing: a four-panel blowout translated seamlessly onto the screen.
The question looming, however, was "How could
The Dark Knight Rises possibly measure up?" With
huge shoes to fill in terms of its predecessor,
TDKR now would suffer comparison to its
massively successful Marvel competitor as well. So, how did it do?
It pains me to say this.
The Dark Knight Rises just isn't as good as
The Dark Knight. It's not even as good as
Batman Begins. While it's far from being a bad movie--it's still head and shoulders over dreck like
Daredevil or
Green Lantern--it's just not a good movie either. This was supposed to be Christopher Nolan's "piece de resistance," but
The Dark Knight Rises collapses under its own bulk, entangled in a bloated, unwieldy plot.
|
The Dark Knight Rises
An unsatisfying ending to
Christopher Nolan's genre-defining run. |
TDKR begins eight years following the events of
The Dark Knight. After the death of Harvey Dent, Bruce Wayne (Christian Bale) has vanished from the public eye and has retired the Batman mantle. When rumors of a mercenary named Bane (Tom Hardy) begin emerging, coupled with links to the League of Shadows, Wayne takes up his cape and cowl once more to investigate the motives behind Bane's activities. However, as he does so, Wayne's company teeters on the edge of default as a new technologies firm run by Miranda Tate (Marion Cotillard) appears on the verge of takeover. Cotillard's performance may be the weakest out of the cast, as she vacillates between being a canny entrepreneur and a piece of arm candy for Bruce Wayne, only truly showing her true colors (in an incredibly unsatisfying manner) in the last ten minutes of the film
Bane's appearance is concurrent with that of Selina Kyle (Anne Hathaway), an intensely skilled burglar--never once called Catwoman--who steals Bruce Wayne's fingerprints in exchange for a chance at wiping her criminal record clean. Hathaway's Kyle is truly the brightest spot in this movie, using her femininity for manipulation and lethality while simultaneously providing a vulnerable, sympathetic viewpoint. It'd be a revelatory performance...if Scarlett Johansson didn't already play these same cards as Black Widow in
The Avengers.
Also joining the story is John Blake (Joseph Gordon Levitt), a beat cop-turned-detective who has somehow deduced Batman's identity--it's never stated or shown how--and who pushes Wayne into action. While Blake's character is meant to be an uncompromising idealist and a point of entry for the viewer, he seems to just stumble across major clues haphazardly which, when exposed, advance the plot.
If
The Dark Knight was based in part on Jeph Loeb and Tim Sale's
The Long Halloween,
TDKR pulls primarily from the
Knightfall and
No Man's Land arcs. Without spoiling too much, if you've read
Knightfall and know the basic premise of Bane's character, you can anticipate exactly what happens to our cowled hero. But, the scene in question occurs less than halfway through the film, just after Wayne "learns how to be Batman again"....resulting in an entire second hour of Batman doing the same thing he just did, just in a different setting!
With Batman out of the way after said incident, Bane and his allies are free to establish martial law in Gotham City, stealing the fuel core from a Wayne Enterprises nuclear fusion reactor and using it as extortion fuel against the surrounding government. "What about the police?", you might ask. Well, Bane has them trapped in a warren of tunnels beneath the city, yet for some reason keeps them alive with regular shipments of food and water. The city descends into chaos absent their protectors, holding kangaroo courts to exterminate the city's entitled elite.
Unfortunately, this is where the plot bogs down. Why does Bane keep the police alive? So that we can have a climactic police-vs.-anarchist beatdown scene in the third act, of course! Bane and his lackeys know that their fuel core-turned-bomb can be shut down by reattaching it to the reactor, but the reactor has a flood control to prevent meltdowns. Why not just trigger the flood control and prevent the possibility in the first place? For that matter, why extort the populace in the first place? The plot simply breaks down upon cursory examination, with both villains and heroes taking actions directly contradictory to their own motives and even logic itself!
The Dark Knight Rises further suffers from a core storytelling flaw of "telling" rather than "showing". Rather than acting through or physically demonstrating his frustration with Bruce Wayne, Alfred (Michael Caine) goes on a literal three minute diatribe directly into the camera, telling Bruce why his retreat from the world was so wrong. Rather than show romantic interest in Bruce Wayne, we merely hear from other characters that Miranda Tate is interested in Bruce Wayne romantically, which makes a love scene between the two halfway through the film seem totally unrealistic. Rather than demonstrating the decadence and corruption of Gotham's elite, we merely hear speeches from Bane, culminating in a stolen speech from Commissioner Gordon (Gary Oldman) that went undelivered in the first act. Bane's attack on a Wall Street-esque investment area made good progress in this regard, but the focus shifts almost immediately from Bane's mysterious motives to the police's erroneous pursuit of Batman.
As I mentioned in my previous entry, the element that separated
The Dark Knight from the majority of genre-movies out there was its willingness to address greater ethical and philosophical questions. We didn't simply deal with Batman and The Joker--we examined the fundamental flaws with moral absolutism and addressed the depths to which men and women would sink in order to preserve their status quo. These sociological and philosophical questions arise in
The Dark Knight Rises, but as quick as the questions arise, they are simultaneously backhanded back down.
|
Bane...you won!
You got exactlywhat you wanted!
What more are you trying to accomplish? |
Case in point, Bane's fundamental plan for Gotham. Bane encourages the populace to rise up against their upper-class oppressors, distributing arms to any willing takers. CEOs and socialites are put on trial and exterminated while Bane himself simply stands by and lets the people do their thing. However, even as thousands flock to Bane's cause, he still plans to detonate the fuel core, destroying Gotham City entirely! Why? Well, it's never really explained. His goal
worked. He was
successful! Why destroy the fruits of your labors? It simply doesn't make sense.
I almost want to give
The Dark Knight Rises a pass, simply because of the massive steps it had to follow in. The basic flaws in storytelling, editing, and scene structure found here really are uncharacteristic of Nolan's work and of the series in general. But, at the end of the day, I'm left with one defining decision that sums it all up for me:
When I left the theater after
The Avengers, I immediately thought to myself, "This is awesome! I need to see this again! I need to get this on Blu-Ray/DVD!" I'm even contemplating shelling out for
the massive 10 disc ultimate edition.
When I left the theater after
The Dark Knight Rises, I felt let down. I might ask for it as a Christmas present on DVD, but I don't want to shell out to buy this myself. And, certainly, I don't care to see it again in a theater. It's a servicable, if unsatisfying ending, but it's not the magnum opus we were all hoping for.